The critics argue that the discourse of EE is beset by intellectual colonialism where core knowledge of the field and mainstream curricula tends to deny, or at best undervalue, the alternate indigenous knowledge[v]. Specifically, extant research underscores following limitations of entrepreneurship theory and practice:
Theme | Discussion Questions |
---|---|
Entrepreneurship Theory |
|
Entrepreneurship Curriculum |
|
Indigenous pedagogies for EE |
|
[i] Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. 2017. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16: 277–299
[ii] Morris, M., & Liguori, E. 2016. Preface: Teaching reason and the unreasonable. In M. Morris, & R. Liguori (Eds.), Annals of entrepreneurship education and pedagogy
[iii] Pache, A.-C., & Chowdhury, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education
[iv] Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. 2017. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education
[v] Moosavi, L. 2020. The decolonial bandwagon and the dangers of intellectual decolonisation. International Review of Sociology, 30: 1–23
[vi] Dana, L. 2015. Indigenous entrepreneurship: An emerging field of research. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 14: 158–169
[vii] Joy, S., & Poonamallee, L. 2013. Cross-cultural teaching in globalized management classrooms: Time to move from functionalist to postcolonial approaches? Academy of Management Learning & Education